 Methodological and Cognitive Status of Economic Law AnalysisWaldemar Tyc and Marzena Schneider Economic Alternatives, 2019, issue 3, 469-482 Abstract: The article identifies and conceptualizes the methodological and cognitive status of economic law analysis in the context of the collision of economic and law paradigms, differences in the character and nature of these sciences, applied approaches and research methods. In particular, the etiology of economic law analysis and the ontological structure of understanding of economics, law and ELA were discussed. The idea of pluralism and methodological eclecticism was also presented in a situation that called for the integration of approaches: naturalistic, functionalistic and interpretive, situated on different aspects of the methodological dispute in social sciences. The discourse undertaken in the article serves the construction of a hybrid quantitative and qualitative research model, which may be a useful tool for extending the method of research in the economic law analysis. It may also be a catalyst for the internalisation of the “methodological awareness” of researchers in the application of an interdisciplinary approach in social sciences. Keywords: economic law analysis; etiology of ELA; ontological understanding structure; pluralism and methodological eclecticism (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2019:i:3:p:469-482 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Economic Alternatives from University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.