Threshold Dynamics of Public Expenditure on Human Development: Reflections from India
Neelam Sharma,
Amit Srivastava and
Sakshi Khanna
Additional contact information
Neelam Sharma: Jaypee University of Information Technology, India
Amit Srivastava: Jaypee University of Information Technology, India
Sakshi Khanna: University College of Business Studies (UCBS), India
Economic Alternatives, 2025, issue 2, 514-536
Abstract:
The study investigates how changes in public expenditure affect human development across India and its six distinct regions (North-Eastern, Northern, Western, Southern, Eastern, and Central) using Hansen’s panel threshold regression model. Analyzing data from 1999–2000 to 2018–19, the research uncovers significant differences among regions in the threshold impacts of public spending on human development. The results for pan India, North-Eastern, Central and Southern regions exhibit a singular threshold impact, meaning that exceeding this very threshold level may not positively influence human development and could lead to fiscal imbalances. In contrast the Northern, Western and Eastern regions illustrate no threshold effect. Furthermore, the study identifies that the optimal expenditure threshold is higher for the North-eastern region (81.9%) compared to the Central region (77.2%) and Southern region states (68.4%), reflecting higher expenditure requirements to enhance human development levels. In the case of combined data of all regions (pan India), the optimal level exists at (80.5%), indicating effective government measures in education, entrepreneurship, and health. The findings highlight the diverse impact of budgetary policies on human development across Indian regions, emphasizing the need for policymakers to consider regional differences in social infrastructural needs while formulating budgetary strategies. Recognizing the varying optimal expenditure levels is crucial for addressing long-term budgetary imbalances and promoting sustainable development initiatives.
Keywords: public expenditure; fiscal policy; human development; threshold; asymmetric non-linear relationship. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2025.2/EA.2025.2.11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2025:i:2:p:514-536
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economic Alternatives from University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vanya Lazarova ().