EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Wagner’s Law – Evidence from Bulgaria

Kamelia Assenova () and Nikolay Rusev ()
Additional contact information
Kamelia Assenova: University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria
Nikolay Rusev: „Angel Kanchev“ University of Ruse, Bulgaria

Nauchni trudove, 2025, issue 2, 35-53

Abstract: Wagner’s law has been an object of interest amongst the economists for years. In its core, the law propagates the leading role of economic growth, which inevitably cause expanding government size. During the last decades the interests to the Wagner’s hypothesis has been reborn due to adopting recent time series econometric methods. In the light of modern time series analyses a correlation does not necessarily implies presence of causality. Thus, the objective of the current study is to examine and validate the relationship between government expenditure (at aggregate level) and economic growth for Bulgaria. We start the research adopting the most popular functional forms of Wagner’s law. Furthermore, we test the OLS models for causal relationship between variables. We do that employing Engle and Granger (1987) procedure as well as Granger causality test. The coefficients of elasticitу we acquire are close to 1 without exceed it. The coefficient of unit elasticity implies that the rate of growth of both variables in the bivariate models is approximately equal. The results from causality tests suggest there is one – directional causality, running from economic grow to government expenditures, which could be accepted as consistent with Wagner’s view. Keeping account for the fact we are working with aggregate indicators we assume that the elusive direction from government expenditure to GDP is result of the different influences (including the elasticity and transmission channels) the disaggregate expenditures have on the economic growth. As an instance, the most distinct difference could be follow in the nature of the current and capital expenditures which exhibit divergent behavior in relation to the economic growth. So, we adopt the view that although the impact of government spending on GDP is hard to detect on aggregate level, such causality is possible to get on disaggregate level. The last assumption is beyond the scope of the current paper and is an educated proposal for further research.

Keywords: public spending; economic growth; fiscal policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H30 H50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://unwe-research-papers.org/bg/journalissues/article/11700 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2025:2:1:p:35-53

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Nauchni trudove from University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vanya Lazarova ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-13
Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2025:2:1:p:35-53