The whole elephant: A proposal for integrating cash, accrual, and sustainability-gap accounts

Timothy Irwin ()

OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2015, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-18

Abstract: Although the budget deficit is much discussed in political debate and economic research, there is no agreement on how it should be measured. There are at least four options, which can be called the cash deficit, the financial deficit, the full-accrual deficit, and the comprehensive deficit. Each is informative, but each has problems of relevance or reliability. Some are more vulnerable to manipulation involving assets and liabilities that are unrecognised in the underlying accounting, others to manipulation involving the mismeasurement of recognised assets and liabilities. Governments should publish all four in a form that reveals their interrelationships. JEL classification: H6, H61, H62 Keywords: Accrual accounts, comprehensive accounts, liabilities, budget deficit

JEL-codes: H6 H61 H62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jrw6591hns1 (text/html)
Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Whole Elephant: A Proposal for Integrating Cash, Accrual, and Sustainability-Gap Accounts (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:govkaa:5jrw6591hns1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in OECD Journal on Budgeting from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().