Where have all the insolvencies gone?

Helmut Elsinger, Pirmin Fessler, Stefan Kerbl (), Anita Schneider (), Martin Schürz (), Stefan Wiesinger () and Michael Wuggenig ()
Additional contact information
Stefan Kerbl: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, On-Site Banking Inspections Division – Large Banks
Anita Schneider: Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Martin Schürz: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Economic Analysis Division
Stefan Wiesinger: Wiesinger,Stefan
Michael Wuggenig: Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Monetary Policy & the Economy, 2022, issue Q3/22, 43-57

Abstract: Like in many other industrialized countries, government support programs kept corporate insolvency rates below pre-crisis levels in Austria in 2020 and 2021, and continued to do so in 2022 in all months for which data were available at the time of writing (up to July 2022). From information available to the OeNB, we built a firm-level database to examine whether the lower rates of insolvencies were offset by higher rates of firms exiting the market without insolvency and/or lower rates of firms entering the market. We find the number of firm exits without insolvency to have gone down as well, whereas firm entries remained rather stable in 2020 and increased markedly in 2021. On the assumption that the pandemic support payments were designed to keep vulnerable firms in business, our corporate balance sheet data suggest that the support was lavish and probably not targeted enough. To further substantiate our findings, we cross-check our database with the European Commission’s state aid transparency database. The evidence at hand suggests that a rather large share of the public support payments ultimately appears to have increased firms’ deposits, respectively their liquidity buffers, in a highly uncertain environment, and even equity, rather than having to be spent to keep businesses afloat. With the benefit of hindsight, government support provided in 2020 can, therefore, to a large extent be interpreted as compensation for losses due to state-imposed lockdowns or public transfers to equity holders for the build-up of risk buffers. Put differently, the full extent of government support does not seem to have been crucial for keeping firms in existence. Looking ahead, more transparency with regard to firm-level pandemic support payments is a necessary precondition for gaining a deeper understanding of the impact of public support on the structure of the business sector and corporate balance sheets, competition, innovation and financial stability. These insights could help in improving measures for current and future crises.

Keywords: firms; insolvencies; COVID-19; firm entries; firm exits; policy evaluation; government subsidies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G33 G38 H25 H32 L11 L25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:3b738a8d-8c72-4218-82c ... nsolvencies-gone.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:onb:oenbmp:y:2022:i:q3/22:b:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Documentation Management and Communications Services, Otto-Wagner Platz 3, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Access Statistics for this article

Monetary Policy & the Economy is currently edited by Gerhard Fenz and Maria Teresa Valderrama

More articles in Monetary Policy & the Economy from Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank) P.O. Box 61, A-1011 Vienna, Austria. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rita Glaser-Schwarz ().