EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A SURVEY ON BUSINESS EVALUATION METHODS USED IN MERGERS

Jurcau Anca Sabina () and Andreicovici Ionela Irina ()
Additional contact information
Jurcau Anca Sabina: Universitatea Babes-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor
Andreicovici Ionela Irina: Universitatea Babes-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor

Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2010, vol. 1, issue 2, 878-884

Abstract: In mergers, a subject that arouses controversies between the leaders of the companies involved in the transaction is the determination of the exchange ratio. The basis of its determination is represented by the application of business evaluation methods that are completed by a negotiation process. In order to better understand the major aspects regarding this issue, this article presents a literature review of the main business evaluation methods used to determine the exchange ratio in merger transactions. We concluded by showing the context of use and the application conditions of the most used methods.

Keywords: business evaluation methods; mergers; exchange ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2010/n2/140.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:2:p:878-884

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annals of Faculty of Economics from University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin ZMOLE ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:2:p:878-884