 FISCAL DISCIPLINE AND CONVERGENCE OF THE EURO AREA CANDIDATES. CLOSER TO THE PERFORMERS OR TO THE LAGGARDS?Tatomir Cristina Flavia () and
Alexe Ileana ()
Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2012, vol. 1, issue 1, 163-168 Abstract: The objective of this paper is to examine how the current financial crisis has affected the fiscal discipline and convergence in the seven Central and Eastern European countries which have not yet joined the Euro Area (EA), namely Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania. In the first part, we emphasize the importance of fiscal discipline for the effective functioning of the European Monetary Union (EMU). In the second part, by exploring the current status of the literature in this field, we identify scarce theoretical and empirical research on the non-EA countriesâ€(tm) fiscal discipline and convergence. In the third one, we briefly present the data and methodology used in the paper. We report the fiscal discipline of the non-EA countries by analysing their distance from the Maastricht criteria regarding the budgetary deficit and the public debt as shares of GDP in the fourth part. We also assess the fiscal convergence of the seven candidates for Euro adoption in order to understand whether they add to the strengths or to the weaknesses of the EMU, from a fiscal point of view, by employing two benchmarks: the EA core and the EA periphery. The sovereign debt crisis emphasized the asymmetry between core and periphery countries. It is of major importance to know if the EA candidates will exacerbate the fiscal imbalances by joining the periphery group of countries or by contrast, will promote fiscal discipline and sustainability alongside the core EA member states. The fifth part concludes. The non-EA group of countries has not experienced major fiscal imbalances in the last four years, but the efforts must continue in reducing the budgetary deficits and controlling the public debts. In times of crisis, the EA candidates achieved more convergence with the EA core than with the EA periphery, by reducing the distance from the EA core. This is due to a deterioration in the fiscal performance of the EA core states and not to an improvement in the non-EA group of countries. The result is not encouraging for the fiscal convergence given the fact that we would expect an improvement in the non-EA countriesâ€(tm) fiscal performance in order to catch-up with the best performers of the EA and not the reverse. In terms of public debt, the fiscal convergence with the EA core would not be desirable, due to the high levels of public debt achieved by these countries. Keywords: Fiscal Discipline; Maastricht criteria; Fiscal Convergence; Euro Area; Euro Area candidates (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:163-168 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Annals of Faculty of Economics from University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.