TRANSFORMING A TRILEMMA INTO A DILEMMA. A POLITICAL ECONOMIC APPROACH TO THE RECENT CRISES IN EUROPE
Gabor Vigvari ()
Additional contact information
Gabor Vigvari: Corvinus University of Budapest
Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2017, vol. 1, issue 1, 713-722
Abstract:
The European Union with its sophisticated institutional system is the most important regional integration on Earth. This tight form of economic integration converges to the level that Dani Rodrik calls hyper globalization in his model, the political trilemma of globalisation. In this model Rodrik assumes that from the three desired element of world politics: deep economic integration, the nation state, and democratic politics only two can be chosen. We can either choose deep integration and the nation state but then we have to abandon democracy; or we can choose deep integration and democracy, but then we have to forfeit the nation state; or we have to circumscribe globalisation to maintain democracy and the nation state. This paper argues, that this trilemma is applicable to the European Union, although with some modification. In our essay we will reduce this trilemma into a dilemma based on the integration theories of neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism. The recent two crises that hit the European Project, the financial crisis and near collapse of the Eurozone, and the refugee crisis both represent this dilemma. The monetary union and the common labour market, with the Schengen Agreement created an integrated economic area, while in the same time political governing institutions have remained weak that could not respond well enough in times of external pressure. The argument is, that the EU is ‘over integrated’ from an economic perspective, and cannot function properly without a matching level of political integration. This can be achieved either using the neofunctionalist approach and the path of Europeanisation, or using the intergovernmentalista approach. Our main conclusion is that based on events of the last 8 years, it is more likely, and that the intergovernmentalista approach is going to be used. However, this scenario has many possible negative outcomes, out of which the most likely is a multispeed Europe.
Keywords: crisis; Economic and Monetary Union; European Union; intergoverenmentalism; neofunctionalism; Schengen Agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F50 F53 F55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/71.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:713-722
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annals of Faculty of Economics from University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin ZMOLE ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).