EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

DECISION TREE OR LOGISTIC REGRESSION - WHICH BASIC MODEL IS BETTER?

Kitti Fodor ()
Additional contact information
Kitti Fodor: Department of Business Statistics and Economic Forecasting, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary

Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2023, vol. 32, issue 2, 67-75

Abstract: In this paper, my aim is to show which of the data in the Central Credit Information System are the ones that influence the factors that are then used to perform the analysis using a decision tree and logistic regression, and I would like to know, which of the two basic model is the better one. For the analyses, I used a random sample of 500 items, reflecting the proportions of performing and nonperforming loans in the population. For both methods, one variable was found to be significant, which was the ratio of the repayment to the contract amount, so this is the most significant of the data recorded by the Central Credit Information System in terms of loan defaults. If I compare the two methods, I can conclude that both methods have a high level of accuracy, but logistic regression is the one that produced better results, as it was able to identify a higher proportion of defaulted loans. Unfortunately, the decision tree could not identify any defaulting loans despite its higher classification accuracy. The reason can be the unfavourable sample composition. Finally, the logistic regression was able to categorize the transactions with 81,1% accuracy and has better AUC value and better value for Gini coefficients.

Keywords: loan default; decision tree; logistic regression, random sample; classification; ROC curve (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B16 C38 C44 C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/ ... ember-2023-70-78.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:67-75

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annals of Faculty of Economics from University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin ZMOLE ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:67-75