Economics at your fingertips  


Olufemi Samuel Omoyele (), Ojo B. Lucas (), Wahid Damilola Olanipekun () and Timothy Ayomitunde Aderemi ()
Additional contact information
Olufemi Samuel Omoyele: Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
Ojo B. Lucas: School of Technical Education, Yaba College of Technology, in Affiliation with University of Nigeria, UNN, Usukka, Nigeria
Wahid Damilola Olanipekun: College of Management and Information Technology, American International University West Africa, Gambia
Timothy Ayomitunde Aderemi: Department of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Nigeria

Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 2021, vol. 6, issue 2, 88-97

Abstract: The question whether globalization and its corresponding impacts carry a blessing or curse in developing countries has been a controversial issue among both the scholars and the policymakers, against this background this study provided an empirical answer to the question whether globalisation is a curse or cure to industrial development in Nigeria between 1990 and 2019 within the framework of the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Granger causality test. Consequently, the following principal findings emerged in this study. Firstly, both FDI inflows and trade openness which depict economic globalization had a negative relationship with industrial development respectively. Though, trade openness was significant while FDI inflows showed otherwise. In the same vein, a unidirectional causality ran from manufacturing value added to FDI inflows. However, no feedback relationship existed between trade openness and manufacturing value added. Therefore, this study submits that economic globalization is a curse to industrial development in Nigeria because the wave of economic globalization contributed a significant reduction in manufacturing value added in Nigeria in the last three decades. From these findings, the current wave of economic globalization could be a cure to industrial development in Nigeria, if only the policymakers in the country embark on policies that would drive the largest proportion of the inflows of FDI in the direction of manufacturing sub sector in the country. Similarly, all hands must be on deck by all the relevant stakeholders to ensure that manufactured products in Nigeria possesses value added quality to facilitate their competitiveness in the global market.

Keywords: Globalization; Industrial Development; Trade Openness; FDI; Curse; Cure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F43 F62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.47535/1991ojbe132

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Oradea Journal of Business and Economics from University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tomina SAVEANU ().

Page updated 2022-02-12
Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:88-97