Coalitions among Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Securities Class Actions

Stephen J Choi, Jessica Erickson and Adam C Pritchard

American Law and Economics Review, 2022, vol. 24, issue 1, 278-326

Abstract: This article examines contests among plaintiffs’ law firms to become lead counsel in securities fraud class actions. We study lead counsel appointments in all federal securities class actions from 2005 to 2016. Although the typical class action has several lead plaintiff motions, many of these motions will either withdraw or combine before the judge chooses the lead plaintiff and lead counsel. We find that law firms’ decisions to combine correspond primarily with the existence of relationships between law firms rather than case characteristics. When motions combine, the number of selected lead counsel typically increases. We also find that the correspondence of prior relationships between law firms on decisions to withdraw or combine does not increase with our proxies for the importance of synergies between law firms.

Keywords: K22; K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aler/ahac003 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:278-326.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

American Law and Economics Review is currently edited by J.J. Prescott and Albert Choi

More articles in American Law and Economics Review from American Law and Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().