On the Superiority of Corrective Taxes to Quantity Regulation
Louis Kaplow and
Steven Shavell ()
American Law and Economics Review, 2002, vol. 4, issue 1, 1-17
Abstract:
The traditional view of economists has been that corrective taxes are superior to direct regulation of harmful externalities when the state's information about control costs is incomplete. In recent years, however, many economists seem to have adopted a different view--that either corrective taxes or quantity regulation could be superior to the other. We emphasize that one argument for this newer view, identified with Weitzman (1974), holds only if the state is constrained to use a fixed tax rate (a linear tax schedule) even when harm is nonlinear. But if--as seems more plausible--the state can impose a nonlinear tax equal to the schedule of harm or can adjust the tax rate upon learning that it diverges from marginal harm, then corrective taxes are superior to quantity regulation. Another argument favoring quantity regulation is that it gains appeal when the state is uncertain about the harm caused by an externality. In this case, however, a corrective tax schedule (equal to the expected harm schedule) is superior to quantity regulation. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (58)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: On the Superiority of Corrective Taxes to Quantity Regulation (1997) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:4:y:2002:i:1:p:1-17
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
American Law and Economics Review is currently edited by J.J. Prescott and Albert Choi
More articles in American Law and Economics Review from American Law and Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().