The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non-random Reflections
Christopher Barrett () and
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2010, vol. 32, issue 4, 515-548
Impact evaluation based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offers a powerful tool that has fundamentally reshaped development economics by offering novel solutions to long-standing problems of weak causal identification. Nonetheless, RCTs suffer important and underappreciated pitfalls, some of which are intrinsic to the method when applied to economic problems, others that are the result of methodological boosterism. Among the pitfalls are ethical dilemmas, uncontrollable treatments that result in a ‘faux exogeneity,’ distortion of the research agenda, and a tendency to estimate interventions' abstract efficacy rather than their effectiveness in practice. We illustrate these points through the literature on smallholder capital access and productivity growth. Ultimately, we argue for a methodological pluralism that recognizes all identification strategies' limitations.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (90) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Journal Article: The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non-random Reflections (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:32:y:2010:i:4:p:515-548.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy is currently edited by Timothy Park, Tomislav Vukina and Ian Sheldon
More articles in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().