EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

All About the Giants: Probing the Influences on World Growth and Income Inequality at the End of the 20th Century

Albert Berry and John Serieux

CESifo Economic Studies, 2004, vol. 50, issue 1, 133-170

Abstract: This paper presents estimates of world output growth from 1970 to 2000, the distribution of income among countries and persons for the years 1980, 1990 and 2000, and world income poverty rates for the same years. It also presents the results of a series of simulation exercises that attempt to isolate the effect of particular country and regional experiences on world output growth and changes in global income inequality and poverty. The authors find that rapid growth in China (despite a downward adjustment of official growth estimates) had a powerful impact on the growth of world output in both the 1980s and 1990s, but that negative economic growth in Eastern Europe more than offset that effect in the 1990s. With respect to the distribution of world income between countries, the impressive growth performances of the worlds most populous countries, China and India, ensured decreasing levels of inequality during both the 1980s and 1990s. When the distribution of world income between persons is measured, the equalizing effect of China's rapid growth remains dominant through both the 1980s and 1990s, despite the contradictory impact of increasing domestic inequality. Only India's influence remained substantial by comparison. Other identifiable events of the period, such as the economic contraction in Eastern Europe and continued economic decline in Africa, had little statistical impact. However, when the combined influence of China and India's above-average growth rates is removed, or their size effect dampened, the improving global distribution of (inter-country and inter-personal) income suggested by all statistical measures becomes one of sharply worsening inequality. The impact of these two countries is similarly critical with respect to global poverty reduction. (JEL F0, I3, O4)

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cesifo/50.1.133 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:50:y:2004:i:1:p:133-170.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

CESifo Economic Studies is currently edited by Panu Poutvaara

More articles in CESifo Economic Studies from CESifo Group Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:50:y:2004:i:1:p:133-170.