EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition

Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela

Michael Devereux, Rachel Griffith and Alexander Klemm

Economic Policy, 2002, vol. 17, issue 35, 449-495

Abstract: Corporate income taxReforms and tax competitionThis paper analyses the development of taxes on corporate income in EU and G7 countries over the last two decades. We establish a number of stylized facts about their development. Tax-cutting and base-broadening reforms have had the effect that, on average across EU and G7 countries, effective tax rates on marginal investment have remained fairly stable, but those on more profitable investments have fallen. We discuss two possible explanations of these stylized facts arising from alternative forms of tax competition. First, governments may be responding to a fall in the cost of income shifting, which puts downward pressure on the statutory tax rate. Second, reforms are consistent with competition for more profitable projects, in particular those earned by multinational firms.Michael Devereux, Rachel Griffith andAlexander Klemm

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (409)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0327.00094 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:17:y:2002:i:35:p:449-495.

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Policy is currently edited by Ghazala Azmat, Roberto Galbiati, Isabelle Mejean and Moritz Schularick

More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po Contact information at EDIRC., CES Contact information at EDIRC., MSH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:17:y:2002:i:35:p:449-495.