Multiple faces of preferential market access: their causes and consequences
Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle
Peter Egger and
Georg Wamser
Economic Policy, 2013, vol. 28, issue 73, 143-187
Abstract:
This paper suggests an integrated approach to study selection into and consequences of five modes of preferential economic integration agreements (PEIAs): goods trade agreements (GTAs), services trade agreements (STAs), double taxation treaties (DTTs), bilateral investment treaties (BITs), and currency unions as well as currency pegs (CUAs). A detailed descriptive analysis reveals typical integration patterns, with DTTs and BITs often being first steps towards deeper integration. We consider the effects of PEIAs on bilateral goods trade, services trade, and FDI and provide conclusive evidence that single and combined PEIAs are associated with positive effects not only on single outcome but typically on all outcomes. Investment liberalization through DTTs and BITs seems to be particularly beneficial since concluding them alone or in any combination with other agreements encourages goods trade even more than the liberalization of goods trade per se— Peter Egger and Georg Wamser
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0327.12003 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:28:y:2013:i:73:p:143-187.
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Policy is currently edited by Ghazala Azmat, Roberto Galbiati, Isabelle Mejean and Moritz Schularick
More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po Contact information at EDIRC., CES Contact information at EDIRC., MSH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().