Are bank capital ratios pro-cyclical? New evidence and perspectives

Michael Brei and Leonardo Gambacorta

Economic Policy, 2016, vol. 31, issue 86, 357-403

Abstract: This paper analyses how the new Basel III leverage ratio and risk-weighted regulatory capital ratio behave over the cycle. The analysis proposes a set-up to test for the cyclical properties of bank capital ratios, taking into account structural shifts in banks’ behaviour during the global financial crisis and its aftermath. Using a large data set covering international banks headquartered in 14 advanced economies for the period 1994–2012, we find that the Basel III leverage ratio is significantly more countercyclical than the risk-weighted regulatory capital ratio: it is a tighter constraint for banks in booms and a looser constraint in recessions.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/epolic/eiw001 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Are bank capital ratios pro-cyclical? New evidence and perspectives (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:31:y:2016:i:86:p:357-403.

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Policy is currently edited by Ghazala Azmat, Roberto Galbiati, Isabelle Mejean and Moritz Schularick

More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po Contact information at EDIRC., CES Contact information at EDIRC., MSH Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().