Déjà vu All Over Again: Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDR) and Legal Liability

Navraj Singh Ghaleigh and Justin Macinante

Journal of Environmental Law, 2023, vol. 35, issue 3, 377-400

Abstract: As efforts to scale up the carbon dioxide removals (CDR) sector continue to expand, the question of liability for failed storage, also known as ‘reversals’, comes to the fore. There are a range of possibilities and views as to who should be liable if reversals do occur. As well as a need to better understand both the permanance issues and risks associated with given CDR methods, we seek to deepen understandings of and the means to address the risk of storage failure through legal approaches and structures. We review the comparable carbon market scenario that preceded entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol, the current voluntary carbon market, and what implications scaling up the CDR sector may have. We canvass a range of legal approaches and structures, and argue that liability for on-going storage integrity should remain with the party that carries out the CDR project, proposing also an institutional structure building on the same.

Keywords: carbon dioxide removals; reversals; liability; storage failure; trading market units; scaling up; Paris Agreement; net zero (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqad022 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:377-400.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Law is currently edited by Sanja Bogojević

More articles in Journal of Environmental Law from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().