Restoring the Regulated: The EU’s Nature Restoration Law

Emma Lees and Ole W Pedersen

Journal of Environmental Law, 2025, vol. 37, issue 1, 75-96

Abstract: To halt the decline of the natural environment, attention is increasingly directed towards nature restoration. A recent example of this is the EU’s Nature Restoration Law (NRL). This article presents an assessment of the NRL, arguing that the NRL is ambitious but that this ambition comes with a risk of it becoming a performative body of law. To test the NRL’s application in Member States, this article identifies four key ‘interpretive puzzles’: the relative priorities between the different obligations in the NRL; the correct approach to timescales and the concept of natural range; the ‘climate change causation defence’ and the interaction between the definition of restoration measures and pre-emptive measures. The article then articulates the central theme in relation to these four puzzles—the tension in the relationship between the mandated ‘plan-led’ approach, and a potential lack of Member State discretion in the contents of that plan.

Keywords: Nature restoration; biodiversity; nature conservation; habitats; species (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqae032 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:75-96.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Law is currently edited by Sanja Bogojević

More articles in Journal of Environmental Law from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().