Prioritization of environmental costs in Chinese insolvency law: guiding case no. 214 of China's Supreme People's Court

Xingwei Li and Xiaodan Wang

Journal of Environmental Law, 2025, vol. 37, issue 3, 609-616

Abstract: This analysis explores the landmark Sancha Harbour judgment delivered by China's Supreme People's Court in which environmental liabilities were defined as common interest debts prioritized in insolvency proceedings. This judgment represents a pivotal development in Chinese insolvency law, setting a precedent that reflects the judiciary's growing emphasis on environmental protection, especially during corporate reorganizations. The analysis assesses the challenges of balancing economic growth with environmental responsibility and explores the broader implications of internalizing environmental costs in insolvency cases. It also highlights the uncertainty surrounding the uniform application of the precedent and emphasizes the need to integrate financial instruments such as environmental insurance and dedicated funds to manage these costs efficiently.

Keywords: China's Supreme People's Court; Sancha Harbour judgment; environmental liability; insolvency law; environmental insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqaf023 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:609-616.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Law is currently edited by Sanja Bogojević

More articles in Journal of Environmental Law from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().