Currency unions and heterogeneous trade effects: the case of the Latin Monetary Union*

Bilateral treaties and the most-favored-nation clause: the myth of trade liberalization in the nineteenth century

Jacopo Timini

European Review of Economic History, 2018, vol. 22, issue 3, 322-348

Abstract: The Latin Monetary Union (LMU) agreement signed in December 1865 by France, Italy, Belgium and Switzerland standardised gold and silver coinage in member countries and allowed free circulation of national coins in the Union. In his seminal study, Flandreau found no evidence of an overall positive effect of the LMU on trade. In this article, I estimate the effects of this currency agreement on trade. In my gravity model I explicitly take into account the changing conditions in the international environment that affected the LMU underlying economic foundations (i.e., the limits on silver coinage agreed upon in 1874) and its rules (i.e., the “liquidation clause” of 1885). I also test the existence of heterogeneous effects on bilateral trade within the LMU. In line with Flandreau, I find no significant LMU trade effects. However, I find support for the hypothesis that the LMU had significant trade effects for the period 1865–1874. These effects were nonetheless concentrated in trade flows between France and the rest of LMU members, following a hub-and-spokes structure. Moreover, I find evidence for the existence of a 1874 “LMU-wide” structural break, which affected the course of trade flows within the Union.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/hex027 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Currency unions and heterogeneous trade effects: the case of the latin monetary union (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:22:y:2018:i:3:p:322-348.

Access Statistics for this article

European Review of Economic History is currently edited by Christopher M. Meissner, Steven Nafziger and Alessandro Nuvolari

More articles in European Review of Economic History from European Historical Economics Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().