British state development after the Glorious Revolution

Gary W Cox

European Review of Economic History, 2020, vol. 24, issue 1, 24-45

Abstract: North and Weingast (1989) argued that the Glorious Revolution broadly enhanced the British state’s credibility. In contrast, I argue that the Revolution made the state’s fiscal-military component credible but left its civil component no more credible than it had been before. This differential credibility explains the stark contrast in efficiency and hierarchy that developed between the fiscal-military and civil administrations after the Revolution. When the Civil List Act 1831 capped a half century of reform and put the civil budget wholly under parliament’s control, the developmental gaps between the state’s two components abruptly began to close. I show this by documenting structural breaks in the growth rate and organization of the civil state.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/hey028 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:24:y:2020:i:1:p:24-45.

Access Statistics for this article

European Review of Economic History is currently edited by Christopher M. Meissner, Steven Nafziger and Alessandro Nuvolari

More articles in European Review of Economic History from European Historical Economics Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().