EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nothing to Lose but Their Restraints of Trade: Lessons for Employment Non-Compete Clauses from EU Competition Law

Christopher Mcmahon and Alan Eustace

Industrial Law Journal, 2023, vol. 52, issue 2, 409-450

Abstract: Courts on both sides of the Irish Sea have handed down significant judgments in the field of post-employment restrictive covenants in recent years. This article argues that these cases expose the common law rules on restraint of trade as fundamentally inadequate for regulating non-compete clauses in the modern economy. Ultimately, the scope of these restrictive covenants can only be determined by examining the nature of the relevant market and defining the previous employer’s competitors. This article argues that courts should make full use of methods developed by EU competition law to define the limits of the relevant market, identify the competitors of the previous employer and assess the scale of the restraint. Although this method cannot fully determine the reasonableness of a non-compete clause, it would lead to more effective and systematic treatment of non-compete clauses that considerably improves upon the pragmatic and incompletely theorised approach currently taken by courts in both Ireland and the UK.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwac025 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:409-450.

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial Law Journal is currently edited by Professor Simon Deakin

More articles in Industrial Law Journal from Industrial Law Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:52:y:2023:i:2:p:409-450.