TO POOL OR NOT TO POOL: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE USE OF SUB-REGRESSIONS IN ANTITRUST CLASS CERTIFICATION
Ai Deng ()
Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 13, issue 4, 609-636
Did the anticompetitive conduct in question impact all or nearly all class members? This is a question central to a court’s class certification decision. To answer this question, a methodology—known as sub-regressions—is being increasingly employed, particularly by defendants’ expert witnesses. A key step of a sub-regression type analysis is to partition the data into various subgroups and then to examine data poolability. In this article, I focus on three areas of interest pertaining to sub-regressions. First, I review the related law and economics literature related to this methodology. I then analyze courts’ recent class certification decisions in cases where parties introduced sub-regression analysis. I then discuss several methodological challenges, many of which have not been previously acknowledged, and present potential ways to address these challenges. I emphasize that a disciplined and rigorous implementation is crucial for the reliability of sub-regressions.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:13:y:2017:i:4:p:609-636.
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Competition Law and Economics is currently edited by Damien Geradin, J. Gregory Sidak
More articles in Journal of Competition Law and Economics from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().