Why Treaty Interpretation and Adjudication Require ‘Constitutional Mind-Sets’
Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, vol. 19, issue 2, 389-392
Abstract:
In numerous publications, John Jackson emphasized ‘the strong link between international law and national constitutional systems, which must be understood in order to understand the international economic system’.1 This short contribution in memory of John endorses—and elaborates on—Jackson's proposition that ‘international lawyers must morph into constitutional lawyers’ and adopt a ‘constitutional approach to international law’.2 John's regular visits to the World Trade Organization (WTO) at Geneva and the European Union (EU) institutions at Brussels, like his participation in trade law conferences all over the world, illustrated his ‘cosmopolitan commitment’ (as a ‘citizen of the world’) to building a stronger international legal and mutually beneficial trading community. Yet, his ‘constitutional mind-set’ remained rooted in the unique US constitutional law system rather than in rights-based ‘cosmopolitan constitutionalism’ or market-based ‘economic cosmopolitanism’.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgw042 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:389-392.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Economic Law is currently edited by Kathleen Claussen, Sergio Puig and Michael Waibel
More articles in Journal of International Economic Law from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().