Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction Salt Canada Inc v Baker, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020

Emir Crowne

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2021, vol. 16, issue 6, 457-468

Abstract: The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal ruled that it can interpret contracts without resorting to the ‘Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction, taste-testing each case for the appropriate amount of federal flavour and asserting jurisdiction only in cases where the federal content is, in the personal opinion of a judge, “just right”.’

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:457-468.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice is currently edited by Eleonora Rosati, Stefano Barazza and Marius Schneider

More articles in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().