Chinese court rules for the first time that it has jurisdiction over SEP global licensing disputes

Yan Jin and Chao Wang

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2022, vol. 17, issue 2, 81-82

Abstract: OPPO v Sharp Corporation: Jurisdictional Objection in Global Rate Setting of Standard Essential Patent ((2020) Zui Gao Fa Zhi Min Xia Zhong No. 517), 19 August 2021The Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) of China ruled that Chinese courts have jurisdiction over global licensing terms disputes for standard essential patent (SEP) in the communications sector.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpab180 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:81-82.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice is currently edited by Eleonora Rosati, Stefano Barazza and Marius Schneider

More articles in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().