EUIPO v KaiKai—filling an ‘EU legislative gap’ with an international treaty gap? On the interpretative effect of the international agreement at issue and consideration of other decisions on its interpretation

Gerben Hartman

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2023, vol. 18, issue 9, 621-627

Abstract: This case concerns, in essence, the question whether it is possible, in view of Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (‘Paris Convention’), to claim priority from an earlier international application for a patent, filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), for the purpose of filing a Community design application.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpad069 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:18:y:2023:i:9:p:621-627.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice is currently edited by Eleonora Rosati, Stefano Barazza and Marius Schneider

More articles in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().