Eschewing the discretionary court-based approach to child maintenance in Singapore: towards a consistent and predictable legal framework
Ming Ren Tan
International Journal of Law, 2024, vol. 38, issue 1, ebae008.
Abstract:
Divorcing parents generally agree that they should maintain their children. What they often disagree on, however, is the quantification and apportionment of child maintenance. Put simply, how should child maintenance be quantified? After quantifying child maintenance, how should child maintenance be apportioned between the parents? Should the apportionment be numerically equal? Or should the apportionment be numerically different, and if so, how? Although these are deceptively simple questions, they have no easy answers. Unlike jurisdictions such as the UK and Australia, which rely on administrative agencies for the determination of child maintenance, Singapore serves as an interesting case study in that it adopts a discretionary court-based approach to child maintenance against the backdrop of an absence of child maintenance guidelines that could potentially guide the courts in their exercise of discretion. In this regard, this article critiques Singapore’s discretionary court-based approach to child maintenance and advances a consistent and predictable legal framework that the courts can apply when dealing with child maintenance disputes in the interests of promoting certainty and reducing acrimony between divorcing parents.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebae008 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:ebae008.
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Law is currently edited by Professor Jens Scherpe
More articles in International Journal of Law from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().