EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Broken kinship: family property disputes and the common intention constructive trust in Singapore

Hang Wu Tang

International Journal of Law, 2024, vol. 38, issue 1, ebae012.

Abstract: There has been a proliferation of common intention constructive trust claims in Singapore. The main reason is that families have acquired real estate using their collective earning power without explicitly considering the individual entitlement of each family member. When a dispute arises, the claim is often pleaded as a common intention constructive trust. The complication with applying the law on the common intention constructive trust is that this is an English doctrine developed to deal with a different social context ie the breakdown of the relationship between cohabiting couples. In Singapore, the common intention constructive trust applies primarily in a different situation namely in the breakdown of kinship between parents and offspring or between siblings. These relationships are often difficult to unpack because they are imbued with informal familial and cultural norms. Doctrinal complexity is also presented since the common intention constructive trust is often pleaded together with other doctrines such as resulting trusts and gifts. This article proposes that it is time to take Occam’s razor to the often cited six-step framework in Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun to a simplified three-stage analysis.

Keywords: Kinships; Family; Property; Disputes; Common Intention Constructive Trust; Singapore; Asia; Confucianism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebae012 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:ebae012.

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Law is currently edited by Professor Jens Scherpe

More articles in International Journal of Law from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:ebae012.