The Medicalisation of Childbirth and Access to homebirth in the UK: Covid-19 and Beyond

Anna Nelson and Elizabeth C. Romanis

Medical Law Review, 2021, vol. 29, issue 4, 661-687

Abstract: In this article, we explore how the law has perpetuated the medicalisation of childbirth, and outline why this may limit the ability of birthing persons to access and opt for homebirth. We argue that this is inherently problematic because it restricts choice and autonomy in childbirth. We suggest that the widespread blanket withdrawals of homebirthing services by National Health Service trusts during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic serves as an illustrative example of the broader failure to recognise, both socially and legally, the significance of homebirth for some. We argue that, if framed correctly, the law has the potential to support, rather than restrict, choice regarding place of birth.

Keywords: Autonomy; Birth; COVID-19; Freebirth; Homebirth; Human rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwab040 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:29:y:2021:i:4:p:661-687.

Access Statistics for this article

Medical Law Review is currently edited by Professor Sara Fovargue and Professor Jose Miola

More articles in Medical Law Review from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().