Location, location, location: the approach of healthcare professionals in defining the artificially gestated entity

Victoria Adkins

Medical Law Review, 2025, vol. 33, issue 3, fwaf035.

Abstract: Clinical trials of artificial placentas are anticipated; however, debate continues over how to define an artificially gestated entity, and little empirical research has explored stakeholder perspectives on this issue. This article presents findings from the first study in England to engage with healthcare professionals’ perspectives. Healthcare professionals, as intermediaries between developers and patients, and clinical experts, are central to shaping technology integration into clinical practice. The analysis presented in this paper frames their views on the artificially gestated entity by different forms of ‘location’. This illustrates how they align the entity with either a newborn or a foetus or propose interim definitions. The lack of consensus amongst healthcare professionals is shown to derive from their reliance on existing legal and medical frameworks. The significance of this article therefore lies in the evidence it provides that the current legal framework in England does not adequately support a consistent definition of an artificially gestated entity. Further, engagement with this stakeholder group reveals the practical implications that ambiguous definitions could have for clinical settings. This article argues that stakeholder groups must collaborate to develop regulatory frameworks for artificial placenta technology that support clinical integration and account for the interplay between law and medical practice.

Keywords: artificial placenta; consensus; healthcare professionals; legal status; partial ectogestation; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf035 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:fwaf035.

Access Statistics for this article

Medical Law Review is currently edited by Professor Sara Fovargue and Professor Jose Miola

More articles in Medical Law Review from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().