EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Economic and Other Ideas behind the New Zealand Reforms

Brian Easton

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1994, vol. 10, issue 3, 78-94

Abstract: Following the election of a Labour government in 1984, the New Zealand economy went through probably the most extensive market liberalization of any OECD country. It was in three broad phases: the increased use of the market mechanism to regulate business; reforms of the state sector; and reform of the welfare and related (including labor market) systems. The reforms were consciously based on theories which have become prominent in recent years, including neoclassical economic theory and public-choice theory. As well as describing those which were used, and their practical application, the article assesses the associated implementation strategy. Evaluation is difficult, not least because poor macroeconomic performance, probably due to faulty economic management, has swamped any benefits from the microeconomic changes. It would also seem that the commitment that the implementation required meant there was only limited means of recognizing and correcting faulty policy proposals. Copyright 1994 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:78-94

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:78-94