EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Assessment: Economic Policy and Social Democracy

Andrew Glyn

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: The economic objectives of recent governments of the Left were full employment, reducing inequality, and enhancing economic performance and democratic control by measures of planning and socialization. The economic inheritance was difficult--stagnant investment, high unemployment in a number of cases, and inflation higher than that of competitors. The generalized productivity slow-down, slow growth, and the drive to reduce inflation represented an unfavourable context. The supply-side interventions atrophied, were abandoned or reversed. Employment performance was poor overall and sometimes disastrous. Some extensions of the welfare state were achieved and major increases in inequality were avoided, but this record was hardly exceptional. Globalization is often blamed for such disappointments. Here, the emphasis is on the inherent difficulties of the social democratic project--containing distributional conflict other than by unemployment, sustaining support for redistribution when living standards are stagnating, and constraining business while relying on it to maintain high investment. Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:14:y:1998:i:1:p:1-18

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:14:y:1998:i:1:p:1-18