EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Education and Economic Performance: Simplistic Theories and their Policy Consequences

Alison Wolf

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2004, vol. 20, issue 2, 315-333

Abstract: A largely unquestioned consensus proclaims that educational policy is an effective tool for delivering prosperity and increasing rates of economic growth. This consensus rests on far less secure foundations than is commonly supposed. International comparisons confirm that, as they become richer, people seek ever more education for their children; but provide no clear-cut evidence of economic benefits accruing to countries which are high-spending in education terms. Analyses which extrapolate from the incomes of educated individuals rest on assumptions about how wages are determined, and the extent to which rewards are for skills acquired in schooling, which are highly questionable. Moreover, an uncritical belief in educational expansion leads to target-driven policies with serious negative effects on educational quality. A more realistic view of education's economic impact, and a move away from centralized planning for economic ends, would actually improve the quality of education. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:20:y:2004:i:2:p:315-333

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:20:y:2004:i:2:p:315-333