Quantitative easing is not as unconventional as it seems

Peter Sinclair and Colin Ellis

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2012, vol. 28, issue 4, 837-854

Abstract: Policy interest rates do not have to be short. The means by which monetary authorities influence prices and quantities can differ, but the obstacles to altering one rather than the other are not insuperable. Inflation is sluggish, and expectations of future interest rates—long and short, nominal and real—are diverse and uncertain. These factors determine the limited power that monetary authorities enjoy when they conduct quantitative easing. But this policy is not as unconventional as some have claimed, and indeed can be viewed as broadly similar to conventional monetary measures. The impact of quantitative easing, however, could be very different depending on the underlying structure of the economy and the fiscal authorities’ responses. Finally, we note some important caveats that must be borne in mind when trying to evaluate the impact of quantitative easing, particularly given the fact that the world’s main financial markets are closely linked. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grs031 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2012:i:4:p:837-854

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().