Global imbalances and the paradox of thrift

Warner Corden

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2013, vol. 28, issue 3, 431-443

Abstract: This paper analyses the relationship between the global imbalances and the financial crisis. The imbalances were connected with the increase in world savings emanating from the ‘savings glut’ countries, notably China. This increase in savings led to a decline in world interest rates, and thus to greater borrowing, especially in the United States. This borrowing was for financing consumption, wars, and unwise rather than fruitful investment, especially in housing. The failure to invest in fruitful investments led to the financial crisis, and thus the decline in US and world-wide aggregate demand. This was the indirect paradox of thrift. It is to be contrasted with Keynes’s paradox of thrift, where the decline in aggregate demand and output would have resulted directly from the rise in world savings. The paper also discusses why there was not more borrowing for fruitful investment, especially in developing countries, hence avoiding the financial crisis. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grs027 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Global Imbalances and the Paradox of Thrift (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2013:i:3:p:431-443

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().