EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Market design for living-donor organ exchanges: an economic policy perspective

Tayfun Sönmez () and Utku Unver ()

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2017, vol. 33, issue 4, 676-704

Abstract: Within the last decade, the use of living-donor kidney exchanges for transplants has emerged as a cross-disciplinary success for medical doctors and ethicists, market design economists, and computer scientists. This paper describes the fronts on which these efforts have been successful and what needs to be done further to increase their impact. This paradigm is also partially being applied to liver exchanges. There are other organs for which living donation is possible and gains from exchange can be much bigger than for kidneys. Recent academic work on single-graft liver and dual-donor organ exchanges for lobar lung, dual-graft liver, and simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation are also discussed.

Keywords: market design; matching; kidney exchange; live-donor organ exchange (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grx048 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Market Design for Living-Donor Organ Exchanges: An Economic Policy Perspective (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:676-704.

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by C. Allsopp

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2021-09-28
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:676-704.