On the Moral Necessity of Tort Law: The Fairness Argument

Sandy Steel

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, vol. 41, issue 1, 192-218

Abstract: Various theorists have claimed that by prohibiting certain responses to violations of rights by legal subjects, the legal system owes legal subjects something in return, and that something should take the form of tort law. My overall claim is that the best version of this ‘fairness argument’ for a duty to provide tort law is of limited success. The fairness argument, at best, shows that legal systems are under a pro tanto duty to provide only a highly limited form of tort law. The article first seeks to articulate the most powerful version of the fairness argument. It then argues, through consideration of four objections, that the argument justifies at best a pro tanto duty to provide a highly limited form of tort law, if it justifies a duty to provide tort law at all.

Keywords: rights; justice; compensation; tort; private law theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqaa045 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:41:y:2021:i:1:p:192-218.

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies is currently edited by Liz Fisher, Stefan Enchelmaier, Andreas Televantos, Liora Lazarus and Jennifer Payne

More articles in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().