Law, Philosophy and the Susceptible Skins of Living Beings

David Enoch

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2025, vol. 45, issue 4, 872-895

Abstract: Catherine the Great (apparently) wrote to the French philosopher Diderot something along the lines of: ‘You philosophers are fortunate. You write on paper, and paper is patient. Unfortunate emperor that I am, I write on the susceptible skins of living beings.’ Catherine expressed, I think, an important insight, that is true of the law as well: the law writes on the susceptible skins of living beings. This does not mean, of course, that we should not philosophise about the law, or that we should not take advantage of the benefits of having patient paper to write on. But as we do so, we should philosophise about the law all the time fully realising that the law itself does not write on patient paper, but on the susceptible skins of living beings. This has important implications to how we should—and how we should not—do philosophy of law. This article elaborates on these implications—both in general and using more specific examples.

Keywords: legal philosophy; legal theory; methodology; legal epistemology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqaf022 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:872-895.

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies is currently edited by Liz Fisher, Stefan Enchelmaier, Andreas Televantos, Liora Lazarus and Jennifer Payne

More articles in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().