Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil
Kidjie Saguin,
João V Guedes-Neto,
Pedro Lucas Moura Palotti,
Natália Massaco Koga and
Flavio Lyrio Carneiro
Policy and Society, 2024, vol. 43, issue 4, 521-555
Abstract:
Evidence use across policy sectors is widely believed to vary as each sector espouses a specific and dominant pattern in how it sources evidence. This view privileges the idea that a “culture of evidence” serves as a norm that guides behavior in the entire sector. In this article, we seek to nuance the policy sectoral approach to understanding evidence use by analyzing the results of a large-N survey of federal employees in Brazil (n = 2,177). Our findings show a diverse set of cultures of evidence with a few sectors like Science and Technology demonstrating a strong likelihood for using scientific evidence with most sectors showing a mixed pattern of sourcing evidence. However, a majority of the surveyed civil servants show an “indistinct” pattern of evidence use who are likely to not use any sources of evidence.
Keywords: evidence use; culture of evidence; policy sector; Brazil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/polsoc/puae031 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:521-555.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Policy and Society is currently edited by Daniel Béland, Giliberto Capano, Michael Howlett and M. Ramesh
More articles in Policy and Society from Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().