Tribes and States: A New Era in Intergovernmental Affairs

W. Dale Mason

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 28, issue 1, 111-130

Abstract: The history of tribal-state conflict and the role of the federal government is nearly two centuries old. In recent years, the most contentious source of conflict between American Indian tribes and states has been Indian gaming. The Congress attempted to compromise and resolve the issue by passing the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) in 1988, but the law has only exacerbated and opened up new avenues of conflict. The scope and stakes of Indian gaming can be seen in the history of Indian gaming in New Mexico where the defects in IGRA have been readily apparent. As Indian gaming has grown, so have efforts to curtail it and other aspects of tribal sovereignty, including tribal sovereign immunity. These efforts are currently underway in the Congress. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/ (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:1:p:111-130

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().