Revisiting Shapiro: Welfare Magnets and State Residency Requirements in the 1990s
Scott W. Allard
Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 28, issue 3, 45-65
Abstract:
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) generated renewed interest in welfare races to the bottom as states received greater discretion over eligibility standards for new residents. Despite U.S. Supreme Court decisions finding welfare-residency requirements unconstitutional and mounting empirical evidence that welfare benefits do not attract poor migrants, state policymakers have enacted welfare-reform plans that treat newcomers differently as authorized in PRWORA. This article reviews the existing research on welfare migration, current state-residency requirements, and central constitutional issues surrounding such requirements. With the likelihood that courts will have the final word on the current round of state welfare-residency requirements, it is essential that empirical research on welfare magnets examine the issues central to the cases currently moving through the judicial system. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/ (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:3:p:45-65
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco
More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().