Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec

Peter Leslie

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 29, issue 2, 135-151

Abstract: The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 1998 that neither the Canadian constitution nor international law allows Quebec to secede from Canada unilaterally. Secession would require amending the constitution. However, if a clear majority of Quebecers unambiguously opts for secession, the federal government and the other provinces would have a constitutional duty to negotiate. This is an obligation that the court declared to be implicit in four principles that “inform and sustain the constitutional text”—federalism, democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law, and respect for minorities. The same set of principles would govern the negotiations themselves. Accordingly, Quebec could not dictate the terms of secession, and one cannot assume that agreement would be reached. If negotiations fail, and Quebec declares independence unilaterally, the international community would have to decide whether Quebec's action was legitimate. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/ (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:2:p:135-151

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().