Multi-Sphere Governance in South Africa: An Interim Assessment

Richard Simeon and Christina Murray

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 31, issue 4, 65-92

Abstract: After considerable debate about whether a democratic South Africa should be constituted on federal lines, the 1996 Constitution adopted three “distinctive, interdependent and interrelated” spheres of government. “Co-operative government” followed the German model, emphasizing concurrency, provincial delivery of national policies, and provincial representation at the center. Implementing this model, with new institutions, actors, and processes, has proved difficult because the governing party strongly favors a relatively centralized polity, and because provinces and local governments have weak political, administrative, and fiscal capacities. The analysis concludes that while the new system has become fairly well established in a short time, its long-term success in promoting the values of democratization, effective governance, and conflict management remains uncertain. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/ (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:4:p:65-92

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().