States and Localities: A Comment on Robert Nisbet's Communitarianism

Robert F. Nagel

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2004, vol. 34, issue 4, 125-138

Abstract: Robert Nisbet, like important communitarians writing today, failed to consider the role of states in maintaining vigorous associational life at the local level. This omission is puzzling at first but is in fact a straightforward reflection of identifiable philosophical commitments and intellectual instincts. The omission is important to Nisbet's thinking in part because without intermediate structures between the national government and localities, it is unlikely that local communities can perform the significant functions that Nisbet envisioned. The failure to take full account of federalism also helps to explain why, despite Nisbet's dire descriptions and predictions, the United States maintains significant associational life even in the face of a nationalized political community. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/ (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:4:p:125-138

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().