The Implementation of HAVA in New York: From Antiques to High Tech

Sarah F. Liebschutz

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2005, vol. 35, issue 4, 597-615

Abstract: New York's election system, virtually intact for more than a century, will change in 2006. New York was the last state to bring its laws in compliance with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). What were New York's implementation choices? What accounts for the state's “strategic delay” in responding to HAVA? Strong, competitive parties and a widespread perception that the system was not broken helped to maintain the status quo. Interest groups, notably voters with disabilities who contended their civil rights were abridged, supported reform. HAVA, with its potential for more than $230 million in federal funds to replace New York's antiquated election machinery, was most important in overcoming resistance. The federal deadline for compliance forced the compromises that reformed most aspects of New York's election system. Pragmatism trumped partisanship and resistance to change. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pji038 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:4:p:597-615

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().