Emergency Response, Doctrinal Confusion, and Federalism in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Thomas A. Birkland and Sarah E. DeYoung

Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2011, vol. 41, issue 3, 471-493

Abstract: The Deepwater Horizon oil spill was accompanied by intergovernmental blame casting and criticisms similar to that of Hurricane Katrina. The federal response was often viewed as slow, state officials were unsure of their role, and local officials complained that they were not adequately consulted. However, natural and oil pollution disasters have relief and regulatory regimes based on doctrines different from those governing natural disasters. This article discusses those doctrines one of which is characterized by "shared power"; the other reflects greater federal direction. The balance of national and state powers inherent in federalism can also lead to confusion and delay in disaster response, particularly when there are overlapping laws and programs and unrealistic state and local expectations. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjr011 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:41:y:2011:i:3:p:471-493

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco

More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().