A Compound Republic—If You Can Keep It: Martha Derthick’s Empiricism and the Value of Federalism
Troy E. Smith
Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2017, vol. 47, issue 2, 153-170
Abstract:
This article examines Martha Derthick’s view of the American federal system as developed primarily in her book Keeping the Compound Republic, focusing on the system’s enduring features and evolution in the twentieth century and considering the value of the compound republic and what is necessary to sustain it. Derthick’s understanding of federalism, which was shaped in important ways by her mentor Edward C. Banfield, favors a pragmatic blending and balancing of national and federal elements to create healthy communities with the objective of fostering self-government. This understanding rejects three popular notions of federalism—federalism as policy efficiency, states’ rights federalism, and political process federalism. In contrast with these alternative approaches, Derthick develops a principled stand for federalism that opposes commandeering of states and supports representative self-government.
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjw034 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:publus:v:47:y:2017:i:2:p:153-170.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Publius: The Journal of Federalism is currently edited by Paul Nolette and Philip Rocco
More articles in Publius: The Journal of Federalism from CSF Associates Inc. Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().