Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?

Susanto Basu

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1996, vol. 111, issue 3, 719-751

Abstract: This paper investigates the relative importance of cyclical fluctuations in labor and capital utilization, increasing returns to scale, and technology shocks as explanations for procyclical productivity. It exploits the intuition that materials inputs do not have variable utilization rates, and materials are likely to be used in fixed proportions with value added. Therefore, materials growth is a good measure of unobserved changes in capital and labor utilization. Using this measure shows that cyclical factor utilization is very important, returns to scale are about constant, and technology shocks are small and have low correlation with either output or hours growth.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (476)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2946670 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization? (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:111:y:1996:i:3:p:719-751.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().